| SYNOPSIS |
The same pattern shows up elsewhere: demonetisation that returned 99.3 per cent of the banned notes, policy reversals from land acquisition to farm laws, a GDP number that has to explain itself against income data, and unanswered questions about how the party treats its veterans and its leader. Subramanian Swamy, Madhu Kishwar and the Mansi Soni “Snoopgate” matter are covered strictly as documented statements and allegations, never as proven fact. The blunder belongs to the BJP and the RSS, who let one man become bigger than both. Sources are at the end.
| THE GROUND RULE |
FACT: backed by a court, regulator, Parliament reply or reputable press report.
OPINION: attributed to a named person. The only thing we assert is that they said it.
ANALYSIS: our reading of the facts. You may disagree with it. You may not call it fiction.
This is not a courtesy to the Prime Minister’s office. It is so that the next WhatsApp uncle who tries to “debunk” this piece has to read it first. Chalo, shuru karte hain.
1 | Blunder, Not Betrayal |
Let me begin with a confession. Nobody at SumanSpeaks woke up angry at the BJP. The party’s cadre walked booths in the 1990s when the front bench of Indian politics did not take them seriously, and they deserve better than to be reduced to a fan club.
My quarrel is with a decision. The BJP and the RSS decided, jointly and deliberately, to hand one man the party, the government and, increasingly, the party’s imagination. Then they left him there through demonetisation, through a farm-law retreat, through reversals that would embarrass a learner’s-licence candidate. That is not Modi’s blunder alone. It is theirs. And the sector where it is easiest to check, hardest to spin and closest to your pocket is telecom.
2 | The Telecom Ledger |
A decade ago BSNL and MTNL covered the places where profit margins feared to tread, and Airtel served urban India with fire. Vodafone and Idea were separate companies with separate logos and separate problems. Prices were annoying, but you had choices. Today the picture, using TRAI-based reporting for August 2026, looks like this.
| Operator | Wireless (mobile) share, Aug 2026 | Position |
| Reliance Jio | 39.31% | Largest by subscribers |
| Bharti Airtel | 38.01% | Close second, strong premium base |
| Vodafone Idea | 15.43% | Distant third, government is largest shareholder |
| BSNL | 7.24% | Public operator, still being revived |
Jio and Airtel together hold about 77 per cent of wireless mobile subscribers, using TRAI’s August 2026 data on a base of roughly 1.29 billion that includes M2M connections. Economically, the competitive centre of gravity has shifted towards an effective two-player private market. Economists have a technical term for this: “concentrated.” Subscribers have a different term: “where did my cheap plan go.”
To be clear, Jio and Airtel are not villains. They are companies, which means they have shareholders, and shareholders like margins. The real question is who was supposed to keep this market honest, and what happened to that job.
3 | First, the Correction That Makes Our Case Stronger |
Let us be fair to our own side, because the other side will not be. The spectrum prices that began the debt spiral came from the 2010 3G and BWA auctions, which together raised about ₹1.06 lakh crore (₹67,719 crore from 3G, of which ₹50,968 crore came from private operators, plus ₹38,543 crore from BWA) and were run under the UPA. The 2012 Supreme Court order cancelling 122 licences in the 2G case also predates Modi. Anyone who writes that Narendra Modi personally invented expensive spectrum will be corrected in the first reply, and will deserve it.
But inheritance has an expiry date. The Modi government has been in office since May 2014, promising “minimum government, maximum governance.” It kept the revenue-first auction model. The 2022 5G auction raised about ₹1.5 lakh crore, with Jio bidding ₹88,078 crore, Airtel ₹43,084 crore and Vodafone Idea ₹18,799 crore. As a fiscal event it was a triumph. As a signal about who could keep paying for spectrum and still build networks, it was a verdict on the third player.
ANALYSIS: The Modi-era charge is not “created the problem.” It is “ran the same playbook for twelve years, watched the field shrink, and discovered competition policy after the competition had left.” If the diagnosis was on the table in 2014 and the patient is in the ICU in 2026, the doctor cannot keep blaming the hospital’s previous management.
4 | The Timeline Nobody Can Argue With |
| Year | Event | Government in office |
| 2010 | 3G/BWA auctions set very high prices | UPA |
| 2012 | Supreme Court cancels 122 licences | UPA |
| 2014 | Modi government takes office with a stressed sector | NDA |
| 2016 | Jio launches with free introductory offers, triggering an unprecedented price and competitive shock | NDA |
| 2018 | Vodafone and Idea merge | NDA |
| 2019 | Supreme Court’s AGR judgment lands retrospective liabilities | NDA |
| 2021 | Relief package with moratorium on dues | NDA |
| Apr 2025 | Government converts about ₹36,950 crore of Vi’s dues into equity, holds 48.99% | NDA |
| 2026 | Sector AGR dues ₹1.41 lakh crore as of March 2026 (Rajya Sabha reply, subject to revision), Vi nearly half | NDA |
Read the list again. Every intervention on the NDA side came after the damage, and none of them brought back the competitor that was lost. That is not a strategy. That is a fire brigade with an excellent press office.
5 | The Modi Government Was Not a Spectator |
The obvious defence is: but these problems existed before Modi. True. We have said so twice already. So here is what existed before May 2014, and what did not.
Before 2014: the 3G and BWA price spiral and the 2G licence cancellations. After 2014: the Jio shock played out in a market this government regulated. The Vodafone and Idea merger of 2018 went through the DoT on its watch. The 2019 AGR judgment was a court’s, not a government’s, and we do not pretend otherwise. But what followed, the moratorium, the reassessments and the equity conversion, was this government’s response. The 2022 5G auction was its design. The 2025 stake in Vi was its decision. The BSNL packages were its approvals.
ANALYSIS: The strongest critique of Modi is not that he created everything wrong with Indian telecom. That is indefensible, and the 2010 auctions prove it. It is that he inherited problems in 2014, and twelve years later he owns the outcomes.
6 | Vodafone Idea: The Landlord Who Became a Tenant |
Here is the peculiar position of the Government of India in 2026. It is Vodafone Idea’s largest shareholder, at 48.99 per cent, after converting dues into equity at ₹10 a share. It is also a major claimant on the company’s deferred spectrum and AGR-related obligations. And it is the sector’s policymaker. Owner, claimant and policymaker in one: in corporate governance this is called a conflict of interest wearing a very nice suit.
No fresh cash entered the network when the stake was taken. It converted what Vi owed, not money for towers. The four-year moratorium on spectrum instalments has ended, and reporting points to roughly ₹49,000 crore falling due across FY27 to FY29 against a much larger deferred stock. A DoT reassessment did cut Vi’s AGR figure to about ₹64,046 crore, and the government has said it will not go beyond 49 per cent.
In fairness, the relief was needed, and we are not saying the rescue was wrong. We are asking why the rescue was always the plan, instead of fixing the conditions that required one.
| CASE FILE: THE STATE’S THREE HATS |
CLAIMANT: a major claimant on Vi’s deferred spectrum and AGR-related obligations.
OWNER: 48.99 per cent after the April 2025 conversion.
POLICYMAKER: the sector’s rule-setter through the DoT.
ANALYSIS: a third private player kept alive on state support stops the market from being a pure duopoly without making it a real three-way contest.
7 | BSNL: The ₹3.22 Lakh Crore Reminder |
Add up the three BSNL revival packages: about ₹69,000 crore (2019), ₹1.64 lakh crore (2022) and ₹89,047 crore (2023 spectrum allotment). That is roughly ₹3.22 lakh crore in announced revival and support packages and spectrum-related allocations. The figure includes spectrum valuation and restructuring support, not simply cash spent from the exchequer, and we want that distinction impossible to miss. Even so, it is a national-scale commitment for an operator with about 7 per cent of subscribers.
To its credit, BSNL has built close to a lakh indigenous 4G sites on a TCS and C-DoT stack, and we say so without sarcasm. But look at the sequence. BSNL was kept out of 4G for years while private rivals rolled out. By the time it got spectrum and an indigenous stack, a generation of customers had moved on and 5G was knocking at the door.
ANALYSIS: You cannot call a public-sector undertaking “strategically indispensable” in the Cabinet room and treat its decline as an act of God at the press conference. Either BSNL mattered, in which case letting it rot was a policy choice, or it did not, in which case why a package of this size? MTNL’s story is shorter and sadder: heavy debt, a sovereign-guarantee bond restructuring, operations placed under BSNL. When the metro-city public carrier is folded into another loss-making carrier, “revival” is being used generously.
8 | The Subscriber’s View |
An honest word for the consumer. Indian mobile data is among the cheapest in the world on a per-GB basis, and Jio’s disruption deserves the credit. Credit where it is due, yaar.
But cheap today is not the same as competitive tomorrow. Revenue per user is rising from a very low base, tariff hikes arrived in 2021 and 2024, and the industry openly expects more. International research on mobile markets has generally found that three-operator markets show higher prices than four-operator ones. India’s effective private market is closer to two. Ask any Jio user about customer care. We will wait.
ANALYSIS: The risk is not that prices rise tomorrow. It is that the one force that could restrain them, a strong third or fourth player, has been allowed to weaken. When two networks are the only ones most of urban India can rely on, “tariff hike” stops being a threat and becomes a calendar entry.
9 | The Photo-Op Premiership |
Now to the part where the telecom story meets the man. The Prime Minister’s foreign diplomacy is extensive and beautifully photographed: “Howdy Modi” in Houston, “Namaste Trump” in Ahmedabad, the Tianjin summit with Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin in 2025. Diplomacy is part of the job. We are not against handshakes. We are against handshakes standing in for homework.
Consider the sequence. The warm hugs with Donald Trump were followed in August 2025 by a cumulative 50 per cent US tariff on many Indian goods: a 25 per cent reciprocal duty from 7 August, plus an additional 25 per cent from 27 August over India’s Russian oil purchases (Executive Order 14329). Subramanian Swamy, in a January 2026 post on X, wrote that Modi being a follower of Trump was a potential danger for Indian democracy and the BJP. That is his opinion, not a finding, but note who said it. The cost of Prime Ministerial travel is available in the Ministry of External Affairs’ replies to Parliament, and we encourage readers to look it up rather than trust anyone’s forward, including ours.
10 | Demonetisation: The Gift That Kept on Giving |
On 8 November 2016, the Prime Minister announced that ₹500 and ₹1,000 notes would cease to be legal tender. The stated aims were black money, counterfeit currency and terror financing. The nation then queued outside banks to exchange legal money for other legal money.
The RBI’s Annual Report for 2017-18 later said about 99.3 per cent of the discontinued notes had returned to the banking system. GDP growth slowed to about 6.1 per cent in Q4FY17 and about 5.7 per cent in Q1FY18, a slowdown many economists linked to the cash shock, though the government disputed the link. The cost fell on people without offshore accounts: daily-wage workers, small traders, cash-heavy businesses. Black money, it turned out, was not stored in mattresses as thoughtfully as the speech assumed.
ANALYSIS: The lesson is not that bold ideas are bad. It is that a decision taken with very few people in the room had consequences for a billion others. Which is exactly what a party is supposed to prevent. It did not. That is the BJP’s blunder, and the RSS watched it happen.
11 | The U-Turn Album |
If demonetisation was the headline, the reversals that followed were the footnotes. Some were wise, which is the point: they show how many calls were made first and corrected later.
| Policy | What happened | SumanSpeaks reading |
| Land Acquisition Ordinance | Promulgated in December 2014, re-promulgated, then allowed to lapse in August 2015 | Reform announced loudly, withdrawn quietly |
| Three farm laws | Passed September 2020, repealed in November 2021 after a year of protests | A year of pain before the retreat |
| Retrospective tax | Scrapped through a 2021 amendment, ending the Vodafone and Cairn disputes | A rare U-turn we applaud, but it took seven years |
| GST | Launched July 2017, rates repeatedly reworked, then streamlined into two main slabs in September 2025 | Rates reworked many times before the rationalisation |
| Telecom AGR | Hard line after 2019, then moratorium, reassessments and equity conversion | Squeeze first, rescue later |
A government is allowed to correct itself. What is not allowed is correcting itself after the damage every single time, and then presenting the correction as vision. Reform in haste, repent at leisure.
12 | The 7.8 Per Cent Question |
The Ministry of Statistics reports real GDP growth of 7.8 per cent for Q1FY27. We will not call it a hoax. Calling it fake is the lazy argument, and SumanSpeaks does not do lazy.
But a serious reader is entitled to ask. In November 2025 the IMF rated India’s national accounts a “C”, the second-lowest grade, citing the outdated 2011-12 base year and deflator problems. In fairness, India has since moved to a new 2022-23 base series, and the IMF said it would reassess; we have found no revised grade yet. So the “C” is a reason to ask questions, not a verdict on the new number. Former Chief Economic Advisor Arvind Subramanian has questioned the numbers. And in theory GDP measured from the output side and GDI from the income side should roughly agree. When the statistical discrepancy between them looks too large, the answer is not “hoax.” It is: show us the income, wage, employment and consumption story behind the number.
ANALYSIS: If the growth is real, publishing the reconciliation costs nothing. If someone resists, we are allowed to raise an eyebrow. A growth rate that cannot explain itself is a press note, not a result.
13 | Use and Throw: The Swamy Story |
Subramanian Swamy has a Harvard PhD in economics, taught at Harvard, served as a Union Cabinet minister in 1990-91, and merged his Janata Party into the BJP in 2013. In 2014 he campaigned for the BJP. A man with that CV, in a government that wanted economic credibility, looked like an obvious ministerial choice.
He got no ministry. He was nominated to the Rajya Sabha in 2016, and his term ended in 2022 without renomination. Today he is among the sharpest critics of the Prime Minister from inside the Hindutva family. In January 2026 he posted on X that the RSS and the BJP’s general body should decide whether Modi should be retired to the Marg Darshak Mandal. That is Swamy’s opinion, and we report it as his statement.
Was Swamy sidelined because he was inconvenient? We cannot read minds. But the pattern is documentable. L.K. Advani and Murli Manohar Joshi, who built the BJP’s electoral machine, were moved to the Margdarshak Mandal in 2014. Jaswant Singh was denied a ticket that year and contested as an independent. Sanjay Joshi left the BJP national executive in 2012, in an episode widely reported as driven by Modi’s objections.
Then there is the question of age. Advani and Joshi were moved to the Margdarshak Mandal in 2014, when both were in their eighties, and the 75-year benchmark has been treated as a convention rather than a written rule. Modi turned 75 in September 2025. Mohan Bhagwat’s July 2025 remarks about leaders stepping aside at 75 made headlines, and he later said he was not talking about anyone in particular. BJP leaders have said Modi will continue. We do not claim a binding rule existed. The point is narrower: how the party treated its veterans reopened a question that its treatment of its leader has left unanswered in public.
14 | Mansi Soni and the Women Question: Handle With Care |
This is the section where careless writers get sued, so we will go slowly, and so should you.
| WHAT IS DOCUMENTED |
In November 2013, Cobrapost and Gulail released audio recordings alleging that Gujarat’s state machinery had kept a young woman architect, Mansi Soni, under extensive surveillance in 2009. The recordings were said to involve then-Home Minister Amit Shah and references to a “Saheb.” The BJP’s defence rested on a letter from her father, Pranlal Soni, saying he had asked the chief minister, whom he regarded as a family friend, to look after his daughter’s safety. Women’s rights groups protested at Jantar Mantar in November 2013, arguing that protection does not normally require the protected person to be unaware. No court has convicted Narendra Modi in this matter.
| WHAT HAS BEEN SAID SINCE |
In August 2024 Subramanian Swamy posted on X that Mansi Soni had deserved protection, and asked whether Modi would now take action. In 2026 Madhu Kishwar, who once wrote a friendly book on Modi, said in interviews, including on Satya Hindi’s “Baat Bolegi,” that his personal relationships as chief minister were conducted on an “industrial scale,” and that she had been shown documents on the surveillance. Press coverage of these remarks is listed in the bibliography.
Now the important part. These are statements and allegations by named individuals. They have not been tested in a criminal court, Modi and his supporters dispute them, and we do not present them as established fact. Nobody outside the people involved knows the private truth of anyone’s life, and it is not our business to guess. We name no other woman, because rumour is not reporting.
ANALYSIS: The surveillance controversy is documented, and two voices from the Prime Minister’s own ideological family have raised it publicly. The political question is not what happened in anyone’s private life. It is whether state machinery was appropriately used and whether the episode received adequate independent scrutiny. The absence of a clean public answer is itself a governance issue.
15 | The Blunder in Plain Words |
Strip away the telecom tables and the quotations, and the charge against the BJP and the RSS fits in one breath. They built a machine that was meant to outlast any face. Then they let one face become the machine, kept him through demonetisation and the reversals, and moved aside the veterans who might have said “let us think again.”
Jantar Mantar has a way of showing up in this story. In 2013 it hosted a protest over the surveillance of a woman. The lesson of that ground, then as now, is that when the grievance is about how the system is run, the problem is rarely the party’s flag. It is the one-man model at the top, where every credit and every decision has a single address, and so does every failure.
| Charge | Basis | Status |
| Telecom concentrated around two private giants, with a state-propped third and a rebuilding BSNL | Regulator, DoT and Parliament data | Documented |
| Spectrum price spiral began in 2010 | UPA-era auctions | Documented, not a Modi charge |
| Demonetisation missed its headline aim | RBI Annual Report 2017-18 | Documented |
| Repeated policy reversals | Public record | Documented |
| 7.8% GDP needs an income-side explanation | IMF’s 2025 assessment of the old series, MoSPI data, economists’ questions | Open question |
| Veterans moved aside, leader’s succession unanswered | Public record, Swamy and Bhagwat remarks | Pattern, analysis |
| Snoopgate and the women question | Press, civil society, named individuals | Allegations, not findings |
16 | The SumanSpeaks Verdict |
The telecom sector became a highly concentrated market: two dominant private networks, a state-propped third and a rebuilding BSNL. Twelve years is long enough to stop blaming 2010. Demonetisation did not deliver what it promised. The growth number should explain itself. Veterans who built the party were moved aside, and the question of the leader’s own succession was left unanswered. And a surveillance controversy raised by voices from his own camp never got a clean public answer.
None of this requires hating the BJP. In fact it requires respecting it. The cadre who walked booths in the 1990s did not sign up for a one-man franchise. The blunder, and I use the word carefully, is letting any individual become bigger than the organisation, the ideology and the succession plan.
India survived Nehru, Indira and Vajpayee. It will survive Narendra Modi. The real question is whether the BJP survives him with its institutions intact. So the advice is simple. Remove the man, keep the party, and publish the GDI reconciliation while you are at it.
Next in the series: power, railways, public-sector banks and jobs. Bring chai.
B | Bibliography |
TELECOM, SPECTRUM AND AGR
1. Moneycontrol, “Telecom sector’s AGR dues remain at Rs 1.41 lakh crore; Vodafone Idea accounts for nearly half,” 14 Aug 2026. https://www.moneycontrol.com/news/telecom/telecom-sector-s-agr-dues-remain-at-rs-1-41-lakh-crore-vodafone-idea-accounts-for-nearly-half-14004895.html
2. ETTelecom, “Telcos Face ₹1.4 Lakh Crore Dues in AGR Payments to Government: Rajya Sabha Update,” 14 Aug 2026. https://telecom.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/policy/telcos-owe-govt-1-4-lakh-cr-in-agr-dues-as-of-fy26-pemmasani-informs-rajya-sabha/133227077
3. Mint, “Vodafone Idea AGR dues cut to ₹64,046 crore; spectrum burden persists,” 30 Apr 2026. https://www.livemint.com/news/india-cuts-vodafone-ideas-pending-telecom-dues-to-6-75-billion-11777564801817.html
4. Reuters, “India caps Vodafone Idea’s annual dues in relief to debt-saddled carrier,” 9 Jan 2026. https://www.reuters.com/world/india/indias-vodafone-idea-unveils-telecom-dues-repayment-timeline-2026-01-09/
5. Business Standard, “AGR relief eases Vodafone Idea pressure, spectrum debt concerns remain,” 1 May 2026. https://www.business-standard.com/companies/news/govt-agr-relief-to-vi-positive-focus-shifts-to-spectrum-debt-overhang-126050100770_1.html
6. BTW Media, “Vodafone Idea: the state as shareholder and creditor,” 24 Sep 2026. https://btw.media/en/vodafone-idea-state-shareholder-and-creditor
7. BTW Media, “Vodafone Idea: state stake without state cash; spectrum bill restarts,” 24 Sep 2026. https://btw.media/en/vodafone-idea-state-equity-and-the-resumed-instalment-clock
8. Business Standard, “2G verdict out: How SC, CAG moves triggered telecom consolidation, debt,” 21 Dec 2017. https://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/2g-verdict-today-how-sc-cag-moves-triggered-telecom-consolidation-debt-117122001069_1.html
9. Light Reading, “Why auction-led spectrum policy has failed India,” 23 Mar 2026. https://www.lightreading.com/regulatory-politics/why-auction-led-spectrum-policy-has-failed-india
10. Lok Sabha Unstarred Question, answered 26 July 2010 (3G and BWA auction revenue: ₹67,718.95 crore and ₹38,542.11 crore). https://eparlib.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/585096/1/89259.pdf; DoT, BWA auction payment note, 12 June 2010 (₹38,543.31 crore). TRAI, A Decadal Profile of the Telecom Sector in India and Recommendations on Definition of AGR and Related Issues (2010 3G/BWA auction proceeds and pricing). trai.gov.in
11. TRAI Telecom Subscription Data, August 2026, as reported by TelecomTalk (Jio 39.31%, Airtel 38.01%, Vi 15.43%, BSNL 7.24% of wireless mobile subscribers). https://telecomtalk.info/india-wireless-telecom-subscriber-base-130billion-august2026/1012285/
12. Rajya Sabha and Lok Sabha replies on outstanding AGR dues (as of 31 March 2026) and on BSNL/MTNL revival packages and 4G rollout, 2025-26.
13. Adda247, “Centre approves 3rd revival package for BSNL worth Rs 89,047 crores.” https://currentaffairs.adda247.com/centre-approves-3rd-revival-package-for-bsnl-worth-rs-89047-crores/
DEMONETISATION, REVERSALS, GDP AND ECONOMY
14. Reserve Bank of India, Annual Report 2017-18 (return of discontinued ₹500 and ₹1,000 notes).
15. Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, GDP estimates for Q1FY27 and quarterly series for FY2016-17 and FY2017-18.
16. IMF, 2025 Article IV consultation staff report on India (November 2025), data adequacy assessment: national accounts graded “C” on the 2011-12 base series; MoSPI’s new 2022-23 base series was released in February 2026.
17. Parliamentary and PIB records on the Land Acquisition Ordinances (2014-15), the repeal of the farm laws (2021), the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act 2021 and GST Council rate decisions (2017-2025).
SNOOPGATE, SWAMY AND KISHWAR
18. Business Standard, “Snoopgate: What links the Soni family and Gujarat govt,” 21 Nov 2013. https://www.business-standard.com/article/politics/snoopgate-what-links-the-soni-family-and-gujarat-govt-113112100023_1.html
19. PUCL and women’s rights organisations, joint statement on the Jantar Mantar protest, Nov 2013. https://pucl.org/manage-press-stateme/statement-jointly-issued-by-womens-rights-organisations-and-citizens-groups-at-jantar-mantar-in-new-delhi-at-a-protest-demonstration-against-narendra-modi-governments-snooping-of-a-woman-in-gujarat/
20. Cobrapost and Gulail, Gujarat surveillance recordings (Nov 2013), primary journalistic source for the Snoopgate episode.
21. Subramanian Swamy (@Swamy39), X post, 25 Aug 2024. https://x.com/Swamy39/status/1827736113794224396
22. Subramanian Swamy, X post, 6 Jan 2026, on the RSS, the BJP general body and the Marg Darshak Mandal.
23. NewsGram, “Subramanian Swamy’s Claims on PM Modi Spark Debate, Snoopgate Scandal Explained,” 27 Mar 2026. https://www.newsgram.com/india/2026/03/27/swamy-claims-pm-modi-snoopgate-scandal
24. NewsGram, “Madhu Kishwar Sparks Controversy With Allegations Against PM Narendra Modi,” 11 May 2026. https://www.newsgram.com/india/2026/05/11/madhu-kishwar-allegations-pm-modi-controversy
POLITICAL CONTEXT
25. Ministry of External Affairs replies to Parliament on Prime Ministerial foreign visit expenditure.
26. US Executive Order 14329, 6 August 2025 (additional 25% duty on imports from India effective 27 August 2025); EY Tax Alert, “US imposes additional tariffs on India for buying oil from Russia.” https://www.ey.com/en_gl/technical/tax-alerts/us-imposes-additional-tariffs-on-india-for-buying-oil-from-russia
27. News reports on the Tianjin SCO summit (2025) and Mohan Bhagwat’s July 2025 remarks on retirement at 75.
Note on sources: statements by Subramanian Swamy and Madhu Kishwar are reported as their public statements and allegations, not as adjudicated findings. No court has convicted Narendra Modi in the Snoopgate matter.
For personalized stock market insights and guidance, feel free to reach out at: sumanm2007s@gmail.com | suman2005s@rediffmail.com
| SumanSpeaks | sumanspeaks.blogspot.com | © 2026 |
.jpeg)
.jpeg)
Comments