|
We flagged Central Bank of India (₹31.07) earlier at SumanSpeaks, and the last few weeks have validated that call. But the more interesting story isn't one bank — it's the twelve-bank cohort it belongs to, and the valuation gap between what these banks now earn and what the market still pays for them.
|
1
|
The Trigger: Central Bank of India's Upgrade
|
On August 4, 2026, CRISIL Ratings upgraded Central Bank of India's corporate credit rating to AA+/Stable from AA/Stable. Its Tier-II bonds moved to AA+/Stable in tandem, and its proposed Tier-I bonds were lifted to AA/Stable from AA-/Stable. This is a genuine step up in credit standing, not a routine reaffirmation.
The numbers behind it are solid. Q1FY27 standalone PAT rose 13.3% YoY to ₹1,324 crore, net interest income grew 15.7% to ₹3,914 crore, gross NPA improved to 2.60% and net NPA held at ~0.50%. Capital adequacy stands at 18.28%, with Tier-I at 16.54%. FY26 as a whole delivered ₹4,369 crore in net profit, up 15.4% YoY. Management has also mobilised $250 million so far under the RBI's special FCNR(B) swap window, targeting $400 million by end-September, drawing NRI deposits from the Middle East and Australia through its GIFT City unit.
CRISIL cited sustained improvement in earnings profile and asset quality, alongside continued support from the Government of India as majority owner, as the basis for the upgrade.
|
2
|
The Bigger Story: A Sector-Wide Record
|
Central Bank's turnaround is not an isolated event. India's twelve public sector banks together posted a record aggregate net profit of ₹1.98 lakh crore for FY26, up 11.1% YoY from roughly ₹1.78 lakh crore in FY25 — the fourth consecutive year of sector-wide profitability, per the Finance Ministry.
Asset quality has moved in lockstep. Gross NPAs across PSBs fell to a historic low of 1.93% as of March 2026, down from 2.58% a year earlier; net NPAs dropped to 0.39%, also a record low. Every PSB now maintains provision coverage above 90%. The slippage ratio — how fast new loans turn bad — eased to just 0.7% for the year, and total recoveries, including from written-off accounts, came to ₹86,971 crore. Aggregate operating profit for the cohort touched ₹3.21 lakh crore, with capital adequacy at 16.6%.
PSU Banking Sector — FY26 Scorecard
| Aggregate net profit, FY26 | ₹1.98 lakh crore (+11.1% YoY) |
| Aggregate operating profit, FY26 | ₹3.21 lakh crore |
| Gross NPA (all-PSB, March 2026) | 1.93% (record low) |
| Net NPA (all-PSB, March 2026) | 0.39% (record low) |
| Provision coverage ratio | Above 90%, every PSB |
| Slippage ratio, FY26 | 0.7% |
| Aggregate CRAR | 16.6% |
| Nifty PSU Bank index, CY2025 | +31% (vs Nifty 50: +10.2%) |
The Nifty PSU Bank index has now beaten the Nifty 50 for five straight calendar years — including a 31% gain in CY2025 against the Nifty's 10.2%. That is not noise. That is a sector that has been quietly re-rating in plain sight while still carrying the reputational baggage of its 2015-2020 NPA years.
|
3
|
The Government's Hand: From Rescuer To Value-Unlocker
|
None of this happened by accident. The Government of India spent the last decade recapitalising PSBs, pushing them through the 2020 mega-mergers — PNB absorbing Oriental Bank and United Bank, Canara taking over Syndicate Bank, Indian Bank merging with Allahabad Bank — and backing the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code as a real recovery mechanism for bad loans.
Delhi's posture has now shifted from crisis management to value-unlocking. The Union Budget for FY27 has set a ₹80,000 crore target for disinvestment and asset monetisation — a sharp step-up from the ₹34,000 crore revised estimate for FY26 and roughly ₹17,000-20,000 crore actually realised in FY25. Five PSBs — Bank of Maharashtra, Indian Overseas Bank, UCO Bank, Central Bank of India and Punjab & Sind Bank — have been earmarked for further stake dilution via Offer for Sale, largely to meet minimum public shareholding norms. IDBI Bank's strategic privatisation is in its final stage, with financial bids already received. There has also been policy discussion around raising the foreign investment cap in PSU banks beyond the current 20% ceiling, though this remains at the proposal stage rather than a confirmed decision.
The signal to international readers: the state is no longer simply propping these banks up. It is actively trying to monetise the value it helped rebuild, which — if executed — tends to force the market to price these institutions more honestly.
|
4
|
The Global Mirror: How Cheap Is Cheap?
|
This is the part that should interest an international reader most. Per Motilal Oswal's coverage, most PSU banks currently trade at 0.8-1.0x forward price-to-book and 5-7x FY27E earnings — even as several of the larger names deliver return ratios in the mid-to-high teens. Compare that with what investors pay for comparable profitability elsewhere:
Price-to-Book: India's PSU Banks vs. Global Peers
| Bank / Market | Approx. P/B |
| Indian PSU banks (aggregate) | ~0.8x - 1.0x forward |
| JPMorgan Chase (US) | ~2.4x |
| Bank of America (US) | ~1.4x |
| Wells Fargo (US) | ~1.4x - 1.6x |
| Royal Bank of Canada | ~2.4x |
| Toronto-Dominion Bank | Trades near ~19.6x P/E |
| Barclays (UK) | ~0.8x (still below book) |
Two things stand out here, and we want to be precise about both. First, the Canadian Big Six trade at genuinely rich multiples — none below 1x book — reflecting an oligopoly structure that Indian PSU banks don't enjoy, so that comparison flatters India less than it first appears. Second, and more usefully: US majors like JPMorgan and RBC command 2.4x book on ROEs broadly comparable to what several large Indian PSU banks now deliver, while Indian PSU banks sit at well under half that multiple. Even Barclays — a bank that spent years under a governance and restructuring cloud — has closed to within touching distance of book value, a level several Indian PSBs still haven't reached despite record profitability. That is the disconnect worth sitting with, not a uniform "everyone abroad is 2x, India is 1x" story.
|
5
|
Central Bank of India: The Microcosm
|
Central Bank is a useful lens on the broader story precisely because it was, for the better part of a decade, the sector's cautionary tale. The stock traded near ₹172 in January 2011. By 2017, with gross NPAs spiralling, the RBI placed it under Prompt Corrective Action — effectively a watchlist for the weakest banks in the system. Gross NPAs peaked near 14.6% in FY18. By 2020, with the bank still under PCA, the stock had collapsed to roughly ₹13-14 — a fall of over 90% from its 2011 high.
That collapse is the real context for today's recovery, and it should temper how the turnaround gets read. The stock has since climbed back to around ₹31 — genuinely more than double its 2020 low — but it remains less than a fifth of where it traded before the NPA cycle turned. This is what a full NPA cycle actually costs equity holders: not a bad quarter, but a decade-long erasure of value that a subsequent recovery only partially reverses. Management's own stated target is to cross ₹5,000 crore in annual profit by FY27, up from ₹4,369 crore in FY26 — a credible extrapolation of the current trend. But the honest framing for an international reader is this: Central Bank today is proof that the clean-up is real, not proof that PSU bank equity is immune to the next cycle, should one arrive.
What Deserves A Closer Watch
The rally has already run — the Nifty PSU Bank index is up over 30% for a fifth straight year, so a chunk of the re-rating case is already in the price. Treasury gains, which flattered several PSBs' profits over FY25-26, will not repeat at the same scale if bond yields stabilise. The transition to Expected Credit Loss (ECL)-based provisioning norms could front-load provisioning costs for some banks when it takes effect. Government ownership remains the double-edged sword it has always been: a credible backstop in downturns, but also a source of slower decision-making and periodic dilution overhang as OFS rounds proceed. And the sector's own history carries the sharpest warning: Central Bank of India traded near ₹172 in 2011 before the last NPA cycle dragged it under RBI's Prompt Corrective Action and down to roughly ₹13-14 by 2020 — a reminder that this same sector has erased over 90% of shareholder value within a single credit cycle before, and today's clean books are not a permanent immunity against the next one.
The SumanSpeaks Verdict
|
What Supports The Bull Case
Record sector profit, record-low NPAs, and PCR above 90% across the board are not one-quarter phenomena — they are four years of consistent improvement. The state is now a value-unlocker, not just a rescuer, via disinvestment and privatisation. The valuation gap to comparably profitable global banks is real and well-documented.
|
What Keeps The Skeptics Cautious
A 31%-in-a-year rally has already closed part of the gap. Treasury-driven profit boosts may not repeat, and ECL transition is an unknown near-term cost. And the cycle's own history is the reminder: Central Bank of India lost over 90% of its value between 2011 and 2020 in the last NPA wave — today's clean books deserve credit, but not a free pass from that memory.
|
CRISIL's upgrade of one bank is a small, verifiable data point. The ₹1.98 lakh crore sector-wide profit behind it is the actual headline — and it is one that a discount to book value this wide, next to global peers, has not fully caught up with yet.
|
.jpeg)
Comments