This Blog helps in disseminating FREE information related to Stock/Share Markets (domestic and overseas), Finance/Investments & Current Affairs. The content of this blog is for information purpose only - not recommendations, to Buy or Sell Securities. The data used here, is derived from the sources, deemed to be reliable, but their accuracy and completeness is not guaranteed. The author is not responsible for any loss in investments made, based on the inputs provided here - 28th May, 2006.
Is US Cotton Really Cheaper? The Numbers Tell a Very Indian Story!!
~Sumon Mûkhâpadhuæy.
------------------------------
======================
The core question is simple: Is cotton cheaper from the United States than from India after all costs are included?
And the short answer, based on available data: No — under normal commercial math, Indian cotton tends to be cheaper for Bangladesh to source than US cotton after you account for quality, freight, duties, and landed costs.
Let’s break it down with real market indicators and hard figures.
On global markets, the standard benchmark — U.S. Cotton #2 Futures — is trading around 62 cents per pound as of early 2026. That’s roughly $1.36 per kilogram on the futures board.
That price reflects the global physical and futures value, not a domestic mandi or landed cost.
In Indian domestic mandis (local market yards), cotton is trading near ₹73–₹76 per kilogram, depending on quality and region.
At a typical exchange rate, that works out to roughly $0.88–$0.92 per kg — a significantly lower base price than the international futures figure.
U.S. cotton exports often consist of different quality segments (extra-long staple, highly uniform fiber), which command premiums. Buyers choose imported cotton when:
That’s a quality choice, not a blanket price advantage.
In industry commentary, representatives of Indian textile associations have stated that even if US cotton is offered with zero duty, the price difference between Indian cotton and international cotton is only about ₹2–₹3 per kg.
That’s a negligible spread in global commodities — meaning any perceived advantage vanishes after:
No sane mill would buy U.S. cotton merely because the raw price was a few rupees lower — especially when Indian cotton is cheaper to start with.
Bangladesh sources cotton from multiple origins:
For example, in the fiscal year 2023–24:
This makes it clear that Bangladeshi buyers are diversifying based on quality and supply needs, not simply chasing a mythical “cheaper US price.”
From time to time, trade agreements or temporary duty waivers are cited as reasons why U.S. cotton could undercut Indian cotton in Bangladesh. However, tariffs are only one small component of landed cost — and not the dominant one in cotton trade economics.
Even when import duties are reduced or removed:
In practice, industry feedback consistently shows that duty relief may narrow the gap slightly, but rarely reverses the cost equation in favour of U.S. cotton on a sustained basis.
Comments