The Unsustainability of a 25% Additional Tariff in an Interconnected World: Impacts on Telecom (Vodafone Idea) and IT (3i Infotech).

~Sumon Mukhopadhyay. 

---------------------------------

In an increasingly interconnected global economy, the imposition of a 25% reciprocal tariff, followed by an additional 25% tariff linked to India’s purchase of Russian oil -- escalating duties on certain goods to as high as 50%, introduces significant challenges to long-term sustainability across industries. 

While intended to protect domestic markets or address trade imbalances, such tariffs disrupt global supply chains, inflate costs, and erode competitiveness, ultimately harming businesses and consumers in the imposing country. 

This article examines why such a tariff policy is unsustainable, with a focus on the telecom sector (Vodafone Idea – Vi) and the IT sector (3i Infotech), drawing on recent economic analyses and reports.

---

The Unsustainability of High Tariffs in a Globalized Economy:

Tariffs, by design, aim to shield domestic industries or pressure foreign trade partners, but their long-term sustainability is undermined by several interconnected factors:

🔹Cost Absorption by Domestic Companies: U.S. companies importing goods from countries like India initially absorb tariff costs to maintain market share. An SBI report highlights that U.S. businesses have borne the brunt of recent tariff hikes, squeezing profit margins. For industries like telecom and IT, which rely on imported hardware and components, this is not a viable long-term strategy

🔹Inflation and Consumer Cost Increases: As profit margins shrink, companies pass higher input costs to consumers, driving inflation. Goldman Sachs predicts U.S. consumers will face sharply rising prices as tariffs persist, reducing purchasing power and slowing growth.

🔹Global Supply Chain Disruptions: A 25% tariff forces companies to re-evaluate sourcing. Diversifying to countries like Vietnam or Bangladesh often compromises quality or scalability, while reshoring to the U.S. is economically unfeasible. The CBO notes that past tariffs (2018) caused bottlenecks, higher costs, and delays—now repeating under 2025 tariffs.

🔹Economic and Political Backlash: Tariffs provoke resistance from industries and retaliation from partners. Countries like India have hired U.S. lobbying firms, while partners like Canada and China imposed tariffs on $128 billion in U.S. goods.

🔹Impact on Global Competitiveness: Sustained tariffs could diminish U.S. competitiveness by raising costs and limiting access to cutting-edge technologies, particularly in telecom where global collaboration drives innovation.

---

Telecom Sector: Vodafone Idea’s Indirect Exposure:

While Vodafone Idea (Vi) is primarily domestic, it is not insulated from U.S. tariffs due to reliance on global supply chains: 

🔹Supply Chain Cost Pressures: Ericsson, Vi’s supplier, faces tariffs up to 145% on telecom equipment. Higher costs may increase Vi’s CapEx, threatening financial stability and delaying 5G rollouts.

🔹Push for Self-Reliance: Tariffs may accelerate India’s Atmanirbhar Bharat initiative, but local ecosystem development takes years.

🔹Indirect Enterprise Impact: If Vi’s multinational clients face higher costs, they may cut telecom spending, reducing Vi’s enterprise revenues.

The TIA estimates tariffs could cost the U.S. telecom equipment industry hundreds of millions, delaying 5G deployments—with Vi indirectly impacted.

---

IT Sector: 3i Infotech’s Resilience and Risks:

The IT services sector (e.g., 3i Infotech) is less directly hit but faces indirect risks:

🔹Reduced U.S. Client Spending: Clients may delay IT projects, cutting demand for 3i Infotech’s services.

🔹Supply Chain Dependencies: Tariffs on servers and data center components (20–25%) raise costs for AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, trickling down to IT firms.

🔹Opportunities for Adaptation: 3i Infotech can diversify beyond U.S. clients, strengthen domestic focus, and invest in SDN/NFV to cut hardware reliance.

---

Broader Economic Impacts:

🔹SBI estimates tariffs could reduce U.S. GDP growth by 40–50 bps.

🔹J.P. Morgan projects the U.S. effective tariff rate near 18–20%, with some sectors possibly rising to 200%.

🔹India’s telecom manufacturers like Tejas Networks face 50% duty, eroding competitiveness and threatening PLI program goals.

🔹On August 26, 2025, Indian stock markets fell ~1%, reflecting tariff-driven uncertainty.

---

Strategies for Mitigation:

🔹Supply Chain Diversification: Source from tariff-exempt countries.

🔹Network Virtualization: Adopt vRAN and cloud-native solutions.

🔹Domestic Manufacturing: Boost self-reliance (long-term).

🔹Scenario Planning: Use AI-driven analytics for tariff impact modeling.

---

Conclusion:

A 25% additional tariff (up to 50%) is unsustainable in a global economy.

🔹For Vodafone Idea, CapEx and 5G rollouts are at risk.

🔹For 3i Infotech, risks stem from reduced U.S. spending and hardware cost inflation.

🔹Broader effects: lower U.S. GDP growth, higher inflation, trade retaliation, and reduced competitiveness.

Collaborative efforts among governments, businesses, and international bodies (WTO) are essential to balance protectionism with globalization, ensuring long-term sustainability for sectors like telecom and IT.