Trump’s Trade Gambit — Tariffs, Tension, TRPs: How Indian Media Is Monetizing the Madness.
~By Sumon Mukhopadhyay.
----------------------------------
But while the headlines scream about rising costs for Indian jewelry, textiles, and leather goods in the US, and New Delhi scrambles to recalculate balance sheets, one industry remains untouched—but unusually excited: the Indian Media Sector. Surprisingly, even though the sector isn't directly targeted, it might just end up being an unexpected winner in the Trump-triggered turbulence.
While tariffs slap physical goods, digital content moves freely, impervious to border taxes. For news outlets, influencers, and opinion writers, this isn’t a crisis—it’s content - gold.
No Tariffs on Bytes and Broadcasts:
Let’s be clear from the outset: Trump’s tariff does not apply to Indian IT services, media exports, or content licensing. Unlike merchandise exports, digital media, news, and entertainment flow freely under the radar of tariff regimes. There’s no 25% tax on YouTube videos, editorials, or television debates—yet.
So, economically speaking, the Indian media sector isn’t bruised. There’s no threat to ad revenue from US audiences, no sudden cut in syndication deals, and no reduction in offshore contracts with U.S.-based content firms.
Indian media exports?
Think of YouTube channels, editorial columns, OTT series—remain blissfully outside the tariff perimeter. There’s no 25% surcharge on sarcasm, no import duty on panel debates.
- IT services: Unaffected for now.
- Digital media licensing: Business as usual.
- International collaborations: Still viable, especially for geo-political content.
Trump: The Content Catalyst:
The tariff drama has revived the perennial Trump content frenzy. Here’s how media ecosystems across regions are capitalizing:
| Region | Media Impact Highlights |
|---|---|
| India | Prime-time political debates surge; NRI-focused channels amplify trade drama. Endless panels on "Trump the Bully," “America’s Return to Protectionism,” or “India’s Diplomatic Balancing Act.” |
| Gulf | Expats tune in, cautious editorial tones emerge due to diplomatic constraints. |
| US/Canada | Liberal outlets decry protectionism; conservative media celebrates “economic patriotism.” |
| Europe | German and French outlets frame India as a post-China sourcing alternative. |
India’s Gems & Jewelry Trade: A Study in Strategic Resilience:
India’s gems and jewelry exports in FY25 (April 2024–March 2025) totaled $28.5 billion, reflecting an 11.72% decline compared to the previous year. This downturn was largely attributed to global headwinds—geopolitical tensions, volatile gold prices, and a softening in discretionary demand across major markets.
Yet amid the contraction, one market stood firm: the United States. With $8.34 billion in shipments, the U.S. remained the largest buyer of Indian jewelry, underscoring its role as the cornerstone of India’s external trade strategy in this segment.
In contrast, CY24 (Calendar Year 2024) offers a more optimistic snapshot. India supplied $11.58 billion worth of gems and jewelry to the U.S., capturing nearly 13% of America’s total $89.12 billion imports in this category. The divergence between fiscal and calendar year data reveals something subtle but significant: India’s exporters weren’t just reacting to global uncertainty—they were anticipating it.
The unusually high January–March 2024 surge suggests Indian suppliers front-loaded shipments ahead of anticipated U.S. tariff shifts and policy changes, especially under Trump’s revived protectionist rhetoric. What appears as a dip in FY25 is, in fact, a result of strategic timing—a trade maneuver to outpace geopolitical volatility.
Put differently, faced with looming tariff risks and policy uncertainty, Indian exporters accelerated shipments in early 2024, boosting calendar year totals while softening fiscal year impacts. This timing strategy reflects not weakness but a resilient, adaptive trade playbook.
Taken together, the numbers don’t signal decline—they reflect agility. India didn’t retreat; it repositioned. By retaining its position as America’s top jewelry source during turbulent times, it demonstrated both staying power and diplomatic relevance.
Far from losing ground, India maintained its place as the largest supplier of jewelry to the United States—signaling durability in demand even as protectionist winds blow.
For global observers, this data divergence isn’t a contradiction—it’s a case study in trade agility. And for Indian media, it serves as a narrative lens: a reminder that when Trump throws tariff curveballs, India meets them with economic resilience and editorial clarity.
A Quiet Surge: Indian Media’s Global Footprint Expands Amid Turbulence:
Conclusion: Drama Over Duty:
Trump’s tariffs are costing India—but not its storytellers. As exporters rethink logistics, media moguls grab microphones. The real currency? Attention. And Trump still holds it like a pro.
So while some sectors feel bruised, Indian media is busy broadcasting the drama, feeding the outrage, and monetizing every tweet, tariff, and televised outburst.

Comments