Image
SumanSpeaks Capital Markets & Geopolitical Intelligence  ·  Estd 2006   Insolvency Law · Corporate Accountability When the Law Works Exactly as Designed — And Still Feels Wrong ₹22,006 crore in personal guarantees. Settled for ₹6.5 crore. Approved 80.81% to a minority that included two public sector banks — with the tribunal's own bench divided before a tie-breaking member stepped in. Subhash Chandra (Goenka), founder of the Essel Group and promoter emeritus of Zee, has settled a personal guarantee liability of ₹22,006 crore for ₹6.5 crore. The National Company Law Tribunal approved the plan this week. The case began small. In 2022, Indiabulls Housing Finance — now Sammaan Capital — moved against Chandra over a personal guarantee on a ₹170 crore loan to Vivek Infracon. By the time the insolvency plea was admitted in 2024, admitted c...
Financial Tech contests CBI charges
Photo: First Biz
[Editor: Mr.Jignesh Shah, was a non-executive director of NSEL and was not involved in its day-to-day operations. Mr.Shah's lawyer Mahesh Jethmalani has reportedly argued in court that Shah had no knowledge of the crisis, saying it was perpetrated by a clutch of NSEL employees and brokers, including Anjani Sinha, former chief executive of the commodity exchange. FTIL's net profit rose 57.93% to Rs.128.24 crore on 27.43% increase in total income to Rs.216.05 crore in Q1 June 2014 over Q1 June 2013. FTIL is among the global leaders in offering technology IP (Intellectual Property) and domain expertise to create and trade on next generation financial markets. It is a global leader in creating and operating next-generation tech centric financial exchanges]
MUMBAI, AUGUST 26:  Financial Technologies has contested CBI's charges of irregularities in grant of licence last year to its subsidiary MCX Stock Exchange. The CBI had accused Financial Technologies of entering into a buyback agreement with banks while reducing its stake to meet SEBI norms.

FTIL has quoted the Bombay High Court order to clarify that the “buy-back agreement cannot be held illegal as found in the impugned order of the Whole Time Member of SEBI on the ground that they constitute forward contacts.” Hence, the accusation of CBI does not hold ground, said the company.

Promoter not liable
On the CBI indictment for not disclosing the buyback agreement to the regulator at the time of application seeking extension of the MCX-SX licence, FTIL said the application was filed by the exchange and not by the promoter-company. Therefore, the promoter is not liable for the matter, it said.

MCX-SX was set up by FTIL and its commodity exchange arm MCX and began functioning as a full-fledged stock exchange last year after a prolonged battle with SEBI.

On Monday, CBI filed FIRs against three serving SEBI officials Muralidhar Rao, Executive Director; Vishakha More, Assistant General Manager and Rajesh Dangeti, Deputy General Manager. It also filed an FIR against former Executive Director JN Gupta besides FTIL promoter Jignesh Shah for alleged irregularities aimed at obtaining a licence to operate the stock exchange.

Courtesy: The Hindu Businessline

Comments

Popular posts from this blog