Discrimination faced by Mumbaikars...

If the housing societies in Mumbai (Bombay) are only meant for families (married couples), then the government of Maharashtra should make marriage compulsory in the state/city.
Or else the government should tell its citizens where will Unmarried, Divorcees, Bachelors, Spinsters live in the city of skyscrapers or is Bombay only for those who have families.
This is one of the greatest mental blocks of Mumbaikars, who otherwise want to bask in the FALSE HALO of Cosmopolitanism.
This disease (of not giving apartments to Bachelors, Muslims, etc on rent) is specially prevalent in housing societies where the Gujaratis, Marathis and North Indians (to some extent) abound; while the rest of the population is more or less okay with the concept.
The government of Maharashtra should take this matter seriously and devise laws to eradicate this malice ASAP, so that BOMBAY (and its suburbs) becomes free of discrimination based on Marital Status, Religion, etc. Or else the Honourable Supreme Court of India should step in, and give directions to the state or central governments -- so that the fundamental rights of its citizens enshrined in the constitution of India is not violated.

Friday, March 22, 2013

Market Mantra
Buy Nifty_Futures at 5670, T--5740, SL--5650. The momentum oscillators are now highly oversold and at the same time, the Nifty spot is now near an important support levels.
Buy IVRCL Ltd at Rs.18, T--Rs.26 and SL--Rs.16. The infrastructure sector is expected to pick up in the last week of this month (March, 2013). According to media reports, putting a finish to the face-off between the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) and Ministry of Environment & Forests (MOEF), the latter has delinked environmental and forest clearances in case of all linear projects like roads, rail tracks, transmission lines. The Supreme Court (SC) Forest Bench previous week allowed the MoEF to modify the 2011 norms, which were based on the apex court's verdict in the Lafarge case. Modifying its September 9, 2011 guidelines, the MoEF has issued a fresh office memorandum, dated March 19, 2013, saying that pending forest and environment clearance to a linear project may be granted, provided it is 'explicitly certified' by the user agency that in case the forest clearance for the non-forest use of forest land falling in the alignment does not come by, the user agency will shift to a "technically feasible" alternative alignment that will not intrude on forest land. For projects involving widening or expansion of existing national highways, while work will be permitted to start on non-forest land, the user agency has been asked to submit an undertaking stating that in case forest clearance is denied for expansion of the highway where it traverses through forest land the road along forest portions will not be widened and maintained at existing width. The road transport ministry has been at loggerheads with the MoEF over alleged delays in granting of clearance and blamed it for slow development in projects worth over INR 2,000 crore. With GMR recently terminating the concession contract with NHAI for the 555 kilometer (km) Kishangarh-Udaipur-Ahmedabad project over delayed environmental and forest clearances, things worsened between the 2 ministries.