Presidential Elections: Support Dr.Meira Kumar
Bihar and Jharkhand governments have no choice but to support Dr.Meira Kumar. As defeat of "Bihar ki Beti" will invariably bring Shame to the Biharis and Jharkhandis (or erstwhile unified Bihar). Do you think that, people of Bihar will leave Nitish Kumar Scott - free, if Dr.Meira Kumar loses ? So, Nitish Kumar has very little option left but to support, Dr.Meira Kumar.
Moreover, if Nitish Kumar wants to fall in the BJP's well calculated electoral TRAP no one can save him in the next election.
Also, I am surprised to see Mr.Navin Pattanayak, so easily chewing the RSS bait. Orissa is a state, where there is large chunk of Tribal Christian voters loyal to the BJD (Biju Janata Dal). I am still to fathom, BJD's sudden electoral gamble of siding with the RSS and the BJP; when Mr.Pattanayak has been maintaining distance from them since some time.
Besides, the election of Dr.Meira Kumar, who is educated, experienced and very sober, might also correct some of the historical mistakes of not making her father, the Prime Minister of India.
Also, I don't think all the Muslim and Christian MPs and MLAs from the TDP and TRS will ever support a RSS backed Candidate, who acted against Dalit Christian and Muslin reservations. Therefore, invariably cross voting will take place, which might give the underdog, Ms.Kumar, a win. Support Dr.Meira Kumar, give a conscience vote and make her the 2nd Female President of India.
All the best to Dr.Meira Kumar.....👍✌
Friday, March 22, 2013
Buy Nifty_Futures at 5670, T--5740, SL--5650. The momentum oscillators are now highly oversold and at the same time, the Nifty spot is now near an important support levels.
Buy IVRCL Ltd at Rs.18, T--Rs.26 and SL--Rs.16. The infrastructure sector is expected to pick up in the last week of this month (March, 2013). According to media reports, putting a finish to the face-off between the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) and Ministry of Environment & Forests (MOEF), the latter has delinked environmental and forest clearances in case of all linear projects like roads, rail tracks, transmission lines. The Supreme Court (SC) Forest Bench previous week allowed the MoEF to modify the 2011 norms, which were based on the apex court's verdict in the Lafarge case. Modifying its September 9, 2011 guidelines, the MoEF has issued a fresh office memorandum, dated March 19, 2013, saying that pending forest and environment clearance to a linear project may be granted, provided it is 'explicitly certified' by the user agency that in case the forest clearance for the non-forest use of forest land falling in the alignment does not come by, the user agency will shift to a "technically feasible" alternative alignment that will not intrude on forest land. For projects involving widening or expansion of existing national highways, while work will be permitted to start on non-forest land, the user agency has been asked to submit an undertaking stating that in case forest clearance is denied for expansion of the highway where it traverses through forest land the road along forest portions will not be widened and maintained at existing width. The road transport ministry has been at loggerheads with the MoEF over alleged delays in granting of clearance and blamed it for slow development in projects worth over INR 2,000 crore. With GMR recently terminating the concession contract with NHAI for the 555 kilometer (km) Kishangarh-Udaipur-Ahmedabad project over delayed environmental and forest clearances, things worsened between the 2 ministries.